Standards

I’ve spent a great deal of time over the past few weeks on the road. Heck, I’ve spent a great deal of time over the last few decades on the road. But as I was circling Logan again today due to thunderstorms (nothing like a 2.5 hour flight from DC-Boston to give you time to think), I started thinking about a few ways technology has made my travel experience so much different over the past few years.

Here’s a few that spring to mind—remarkably all came of age in the last ten years.

1. Smartphones. What did I do in taxis when I couldn’t check my email? Of course, ten years ago the driver may not have been on the phone for the whole trip as well.

2. Wi-Fi. It’s only ten years ago that Wi-Fi was a “technology to watch” in PC magazine. Today, it’s ubiquitous. I’ve come to expect it everywhere—at the hotel, on the plane, you name it.

3. GPS. I can’t believe I ever used to look at a map to get where I was going. Oh, wait, I didn’t, I just got lost a lot and wouldn’t ask directions

4. Camera phones. I love sending my kids photos of where I am and love getting their messages back. It’s hard to believe that I saw my first camera phone at a standards meeting ten years ago and at the time, industry analysts called them a fad.

An interesting thread that runs through all of these is standards. From 802.11.b in Wi-Fi to any number of smartphone standards, the standards community has helped revolutionize the way I travel.

I guess that’s only fair, since I’m often traveling for standards meetings.

Can’t wait to see what the next ten years will bring. Maybe I’ll be watching from home as the Andy-hologram hits the road in my place.

Here’s hoping the hologram is more patient during flight delays than I am.

As standards initiatives develop, a fork in the road that many hit is the question on whether to formally incorporate the entity or continue operating under a more informal structure, often referred to as a “promoter-adopter” model.

While no one likes to pay legal fees, the reality is that incorporation carries with it significant benefits for an organization and the process of establishing a corporate structure is fairly easy. For those considering whether to incorporate, here are some reasons why it’s typically a good idea:

Liability protection: A properly structured corporate entity will shield participants from individual liability. Absent a corporate structure, liability falls back directly on individuals participating in an initiative. This becomes particularly important for any organization planning to undertake testing or certification activities of any type, which tend to pose particular risks to non-incorporated entities.

Outward appearance: Incorporating the entity sends a message that the members mean business, and also provides a more established impression to commercial partners. Moreover, a corporate structure is a familiar mechanism for most potential members to be part of, and will likely reduce barriers to participation.

Taxes: A corporation can apply for tax-exempt status with the IRS–most standards setting organizations are established as non-profit corporations.

Finances: An incorporated consortium can open and maintain bank accounts. Otherwise, a member must always cut a check, or a third party must be hired to hold the funds of all (in which case they will subject to loss if that company goes bankrupt).

Contracts: An incorporated consortium can sign contracts. For an unincorporated group to even to hire a service provider, every member must sign the contract, or one member must sign the contract for all, but bear full legal and financial liability under the contract.

Flexibility: Promoter/Adopter agreements themselves are straightforward, but if an organization wishes to have multiple classes of membership, doing so in an unincorporated structure becomes quite challenging. A corporate model can easily accommodate multiple member classes.

Clear (and clean) ownership: In the promoter-adopter model, the various participants tend to “own” various pieces of the organization. One member might register the web domains. Another might file for trademark protections on the logo and brand. A third member might host the organization’s website on its own servers. While such arrangements can work, they can also go badly when and if one of those members departs the organization. (And in competitive consortia, members don’t always leave on friendly terms.) Having the corporation itself “own” these pieces is usually the safest and most stable approach.

Insurance: A consortium or association has a number of insurance needs covering everything from director’s and officer’s liability to general liability protection that is often required to participate in trade shows or contract with hotels. This type of insurance is not available to unincorporated entities.

Intellectual Property: Without an entity, any intellectual property can only be owned by an individual member (requiring licenses to the other members), or by all members (with the attendant compromises and complications of joint ownership) or placed in the public domain (with loss of control). Control of copyright of an organization’s deliverables is also streamlined through incorporation.

Interfacing with other organizations: It’s fairly natural in the course of work for a standards-setting or technology-focused organization to want to (or need to) work in partnership with other organizations within or outside their area of focus. Formal liaison agreements are an ideal way to formalize such relationships, and are commonplace among tech consortia. Without a corporate structure, though, such agreements are nearly impossible to put together.

Moving forward with incorporation doesn’t have to break the bank. Whether it’s creating bylaws or filing paperwork with the relevant Secretary of State’s offices, Virtual—and our partner law firms—can help. In fact, incorporating a consortium is typically cheaper than any other approach, since it uses template documents that are familiar from past use. Setting up an unincorporated entity requires custom drafting and compromise solutions that take more time and drive up costs.

We All Have Issues

Yes, it’s true.

If you’re an association of any kind, chances are extremely high that at least one of your committees or working groups has a list of open items, or issues. It could be items that the group hasn’t yet reached consensus on, parking lot items that the group hasn’t yet had a chance to discuss, problems that have been identified but not yet resolved, or even an inventory of decisions it has already made. Continue reading »

association-webinar-technical-processFor any standards development organization, the technical process is the heart of the association. As a result, how that process is created and managed will be key to ensuring an entity’s ultimate success. Yet, ironically, the people responsible for setting up a new standards organization often don’t know how to do it, or even where to begin. Even if they do, they will inevitably encounter numerous unforeseen obstacles that can bog down their technical mission, ranging from disputes involving intellectual property rights to conflicting member agendas.

Continue reading »

Note: Andrew Updegrove maintains The Standards Blog where he examines how standards are developed, and their impact on business, society, and the future.  For more information, please visit The Standard Blog at ConsortiumInfo.org

At intervals, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DoJ) have undertaken public initiatives intended to support the standards development process from the antitrust perspective.  In each case, I’ve found the regulators to be open minded and genuinely interested in understanding the marketplace.  Often, the goal of their information gathering efforts is to later issue guidelines that encourage good behavior, and make clear what they consider to be over the line.  The result is that it makes it easier and safer for stakeholders to participate actively in the standard setting process.  Regulators in the European Union follow the same practice.

Continue reading »